How Vienna found a unique model for low rent
May 25th, 2023
Datawrapper lets you show your data as beautiful charts, maps or tables with a few clicks. Find out more about all the available visualization types.
Our mission is to help everyone communicate with data - from newsrooms to global enterprises, non-profits or public service.
We want to enable everyone to create beautiful charts, maps, and tables. New to data visualization? Or do you have specific questions about us? You'll find all the answers here.
Data vis best practices, news, and examples
100+ articles that explain how to use Datawrapper
Answers to common questions
An exchange place for Datawrapper visualizations
Workshop materials to teach Datawrapper
Learn about available positions on our team
Our latest small and big improvements
Build your integration with Datawrapper's API
We're happy to help. Get in touch with us.
This article is brought to you by Datawrapper, a data visualization tool for creating charts, maps, and tables. Learn more.
I heard you want to write one of these “x is the best country to live in” articles. With a ranking of the best countries to which we should all move to. You know what’s perfect for that? An index is perfect for that! Let’s build one ourselves, to understand what they are:
First, we’ll define “good life”. In social sciences, indices are defined as composite statistics. So for each country, we can throw multiple variables together in a pot: Maybe “a good life” means to be healthy, to have enough money to spend and to have a good education? Then we would choose numbers for life expectancy, GNI per capita and the mean years of schooling. These are the variables the Human Development Index chose.
Second, we’ll stir our variables together. For each
pot country, we do some number magic (aka aggregating) to make one number out of three. And voila, we have an index. One single number for each country, that we can compare easily with other countries.
If we feel like it, we can add a third step and rank the countries according to the final score. That’s what I did for the three indices and the results from the one survey in this table:
We will find lots of “9999” entries in the table: They indicate countries for which specific indices were not calculated. We can see that none of the indices exist for every single country. Meaning, most rankings can’t tell us that “x is the best country to live in” (sorry), but only that country x is better than all the countries for which indices were calculated.
You may have noticed that this week’s Weekly Chart is a table. (In fact, it’s the first Datawrapper long table that we show in a Weekly Chart.) Why did I choose this chart type? It’s a combination of reasons:
Massive tables can be a great choice for our data. They don’t communicate insights but can work well if we have lots of data that readers are supposed to dig into themselves and quickly find the data of the country they live in.
Datawrapper offers two tables: The long table and the short one. Are you confused about when to use which one? I wrote an Academy article that might help you with this decision. The summary: Use short tables if you want to make a point with the data; use a long table if you want readers to explore the data themselves. I’ll see you next week!
Here are two more of the most obvious problems with indices:
1. Indices are biased and arbitrary. To the problems of measuring all initial indicators in each country, we’ll add our personal bias when it comes to deciding which ones to select and how to weight them.
2. Indices are intransparent. Their name doesn’t tell readers what they entail (“Life expectancy in years” is a clearer-sounding measure than a “Where-to-be-born Index”) or how the indicators are weighted.↩︎