Investopedia: “Datawrapper is taking our content to the next level”
April 6th, 2022
Datawrapper lets you show your data as beautiful charts, maps or tables with a few clicks. Find out more about all the available visualization types.
Our mission is to help everyone communicate with data - from newsrooms to global enterprises, non-profits or public service.
We want to enable everyone to create beautiful charts, maps, and tables. New to data visualization? Or do you have specific questions about us? You'll find all the answers here.
Data vis best practices, news, and examples
100+ articles that explain how to use Datawrapper
Answers to common questions
An exchange place for Datawrapper visualizations
Workshop materials to teach Datawrapper
Learn about available positions on our team
Our latest small and big improvements
Build your integration with Datawrapper's API
We're happy to help. Get in touch with us.
This article is brought to you by Datawrapper, a data visualization tool for creating charts, maps, and tables. Learn more.
The best of Datawrapper charts 2018, part 5
Today I present to you a rather curious chart. I had to look at it for a second longer than usual to understand how it came together. (Hint: It’s a Datawrapper scatterplot.) Follow me in understanding what it shows and how Dr. Andreas Loos created it for the German news site ZEIT Online:
We see politicians having opinions. The German site abgeordnetenwatch.de gave Bavarian politicians some statements before the last Bavarian state election and asked if they agree. Like: “Wealthy people pay enough taxes” – yes or no? Or “There should be more video surveillance in public spaces in Bavaria.” The more opinions two politicians had in common, the closer they appear in the chart above.
Andreas didn’t calculate these distances between politicians himself. He used the Python package NetworkX to create a force-directed layout algorithm; to be correct: the Fruchterman Reingold algorithm.
How does the algorithm place the politicians in Andreas’ chart? Imagine that each politician is made out of steel. Between each politician-couple is a spring if they have at least one answer in common. The more answers they have in common, the stiffer the spring becomes. So the algorithm tries hard to keep politicians with many opinions in common together. But it doesn’t mind a big distance (= an elastic spring) between two politicians with few opinions in common.
Andreas also told me about an interesting design decision. At first, the chart was turned 90 degree and the CSU politicians (in black) appeared on the right. The political position of the CSU is center-right, so the metaphor fits. But the data wasn’t conclusive: Andreas didn’t want readers to assume that the people furthest to the right are the most right-wing politicians. He turned the graph by 90 degrees so that the CSU politicians appear at the bottom of the chart. A great example of ethical data vis.
Make sure to visit this graph in its natural habitat where it’s surrounded by more charts. If you want to see more of Andreas’ data visualizations, visit his author page on ZEIT Online. Showing Andreas’ chart is part of a series about the most innovative user charts of 2018. Find the other parts here: part 1, part 2, part 3, part 4.