The gender income gap, squared
November 14th, 2024
3 min
This article is brought to you by Datawrapper, a data visualization tool for creating charts, maps, and tables. Learn more.
Hi, Marten here. I’m a software engineer at Datawrapper working on all things “app,” from the chart editor to how teams organize their charts and maps. This week I took my coding in a more creative direction.
Since starting at Datawrapper, I’ve been wanting to join the ranks of our chARTists. From reincarnating Audrey Hepburn as a split bar chart to recreating a famous album cover as an area chart, Datawrapper can be used in unintuitive ways to create visualizations that go a little beyond its main use case of presenting information and insights from data.
So when my Weekly Chart duty came around this time, I decided to give it go myself.
And to keep up the tradition of famous women immortalized as Datawrapper charts,[1] I present to you: Mariline Monroe.
Inspiration for this chart came from so-called “string” or “thread” art. The idea is to place various anchor points (like nails or tacks) on the borders of a canvas and then use a continuous thread of wool to connect the various anchors creating some kind of pattern or image in the process.
To recreate images or photos as string art, the idea is simple: the darker an area is in the original, the more threads should pass through it. On the other hand, bright parts of the image should remain largely untouched. The difficulty lies in distributing the various lines along the anchor points so that the whole canvas stays as close to the original image as possible.
How closely string art will resemble the original image depends on a few factors: the number of lines, the number of anchor points, and the intensity (or “thread darkness”) used for drawing each line on the canvas.
Draw too few lines, and the resulting image will hardly resemble the original at all. Draw too many, and the resulting image will be so saturated with lines that the whole canvas looks black.
Similarly, the number of anchor points placed around the canvas also limits the image’s detail. The more anchor points we have, the more detail of the original we are able to capture.
Finally, we can adjust the darkness, or “intensity level,” of the lines. Eight different intensity levels essentially means we’d need to draw over a given point eight times for it to become a fully opaque black.
My final result has around 3000 lines with 350 anchor points and uses 8 different intensity levels.
Luckily I didn’t have to calculate these lines from scratch; I found this excellent article online that gives a detailed explanation of the right algorithm. Here’s how it works:
With all the lines calculated it was now a question of how to bring them into Datawrapper.
At first I was planning to use custom lines in a scatterplot, but soon realized that my chart’s data would essentially be empty — a little bit boring. Using a line chart instead meant that I needed to put some more effort into calculating the dataset,[4] but then I had a “proper” chart with actual data.
Once I had imported the dataset into Datawrapper, I customized the colors for each line using the Datawrapper API. And that’s it — another fascinating woman immortalized as Datawrapper chart. I think I might just watch the movie Blonde tonight 🤔
I hope you enjoyed this week’s chART. Also if you haven’t discovered my co-worker Elana’s Chartify tool, which turns any picture into Datawrapper chart art, go check it out — it’s seriously amazing! Until next time!
Comments