Which color scale to use when visualizing data


This is part 1 of a series on “Which color scale to use when visualizing data” (Part 2 / Part 3 / Part 4). If you already have a good understanding of color scales, skip to the end of this article, “It’s not as clear-cut as it seems”.

When visualizing data, you’re almost always working with color – e.g., with different hues (red, yellow, blue) for categories or color gradients (light blue, medium blue, dark blue) for maps.

If you use them to visualize data, hue palettes and gradients become “color scales.” That’s because they all “map” to some data: For example, every one of your hues stands for a certain category and every color in your gradient stands for a certain value (range).

This article gives you an overview of the different color scales. Let’s start:


1 What to color by
2 Hues: Categorical color scales
3 Color gradients in one direction: Sequential color scales
4 Color gradients in two directions: Diverging color scales
5 Highlighting or de-emphasizing
6 It’s not as clear-cut as it seems

What to color by

Imagine you have a data set with the unemployment rate for each U.S. state for the last sixty years. What do you color by?

That depends on what type of visualization you’re using (and which visualization type you need depends on what you want to communicate). Certain chart types nudge you to color by certain variables.

A choropleth map, for example, already encodes the states by position: Florida is in the bottom right, Texas in the bottom center, etc. There’s no need to encode the states again with color. So you can encode the unemployment rate by color instead – for example, by making the fill color darker when the unemployment rate is higher.

Fake unemployment rate data

If you show the same data in a line chart, the opposite is the case. The unemployment rate is now encoded by position: The higher the line, the higher the unemployment rate. But to tell readers which line represents which state, you’ll need colors.

So when you read about “encode categories with colors”, “color quantitative values,” etc. in the following minutes, then this applies to the part of your data set that you want to encode by color.


Categorical color scales 

Hues are what a five year old would understand under “different colors”: red, yellow, blue, etc. They’re perfect to distinguish between categories that don’t have an intrinsic order, like countries or ethnicities, genders or industries – that’s why these categorical color scales are sometimes called unordered color scales. In such a color scale, colors say “I’m not worth more or less than these other colors here!”

Hues used in a legend for a chart by FiveThirtyEight
Hues used in a legend for a chart by The Economist

The most important things to keep in mind when using hues:

Color gradients in one direction

Sequential color scales 

Sequential color scales are gradients that go from bright to dark or the other way round. They’re great for visualizing numbers that go from low to high, like income, temperature, or age. A medium blue on a white background, for example, lets your readers know: “My value is a bit higher than the light blue and a bit lower than the dark blue.”

Gradients can be classed (=split into brackets, also called classifiedsteppedquantizedgraduatedbinned or discrete) or unclassed (=one continuous gradient):

divergig color scale titled
Sequential, classed color scale, New York Times
Sequential, unclassed color scale, Datawrapper

The most important things to keep in mind when using sequential color scales:

  • You can use only one hue in your sequential gradients (e.g., light blue to dark blue) – but almost all examples I show here use multiple hues (e.g., light yellow to dark blue). Using two or even more hues increases the color contrast between segments of your gradient, making it easier for readers to distinguish between them.
  • To decide which data values correspond to which color in your gradient is called “interpolation” and has a massive influence on how readers perceive your values. Here’s how to choose the best interpolation for your data.
  • You can use the color gradients we offer in Datawrapper, or use tools like ColorBrewer 2.0 to copy some. Here are tools to create color gradients yourself.

The same advice is true for diverging color scales:

Color gradients in two directions

Diverging color scales 

Diverging (also called bipolar or double-ended) color scales are the same as sequential color scales – but instead of just going from low to high, they have a bright middle value and then go darker to both ends of the scale in different hues. Diverging color scales are often used to visualize negative and positive values, election results, or Likert scales (“strongly agree, agree, neutral, disagree, strongly disagree”).

Like sequential color scales, diverging ones can be classed or unclassed:

choropleth map filled with green and brown colors, with a legend above, saying
Diverging, classed color scale, Axios
Diverging, unclassed color scale, Opportunity Atlas

Both sequential and diverging color scales are called quantitative color scales.


In any color scale, be it categorical, sequential, or diverging, you can highlight certain categories or value ranges that you consider especially important to your audience or story:

Unbinned gradient with a highlighted “0%” category, by The Guardian
Chart by The Pudding with a de-emphasized “text” category
color legend saying
Chart by Bloomberg highlighting the “China” category

Besides highlighting, you can also de-emphasize categories, like “misc.”, “others”, or “no data”. They’re often greyed out:

Binned gradient legend with extra “No data” category, by FiveThirtyEight

For the rest of this series of articles, we’ll leave the highlighting and de-emphasizing aside. Instead, we focus on the question: When should you use which color scale?

It’s not as clear-cut as it seems

The overview I gave you so far is what most data vis books will tell you. We can categorize these color scales like so:


But when looking at data visualizations, I noticed that the decision of which color scale to use is often not as obvious as many of these data vis books make us believe. Some data visualizations are using sequential color palettes, although they’re visualizing categories. Or the same data is visualized with a diverging color scale in one publication and with a sequential one in the next. And sometimes with classed and other times with unclassed gradients.

What are the rules, the challenges, and the trade-offs?

Let’s find out.

The next three parts of this series provide you with a “decision tree” – a Choose Your Own Adventure of data vis – by asking three questions:

  • Part 2: When should you use a qualitative and when a quantitative color scale?
  • Part 3: If you decided to use a quantitative color scale – when should you use a sequential and when a diverging one?
  • Part 4: If you decided to use a quantitative color scale – when should you use a classed and when an unclassed one?

Let’s start with the most basic question: When should you use hues (a qualitative color scale) and when gradients (a quantitative color scale)? Click here to go to part 2.